Update January 20, 2017: Updated the specs list below for the GH5 vs G85 vs EM1 II Comparison.
I know what you’re thinking. Before the barrage of internet hate strolls though, let me explain.
The Panasonic G85, probably one of the quieter announcements at Photokina. But that isn’t necessarily a bad thing.
According to a DPReview poll, with 29% of the vote, the Fujifilm GFX 50s stole the show, and rightfully so. An “affordable” medium format mirrorless camera is quite the feat.
Coming in 2nd was the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mk II with 18% of the vote. They’ve long set the gold standard with In-Body Image Stabilization (IBIS), now they’re improving it and you can now use it with 4k video. But that’s not all. 60fps sequential shooting in RAW (electronic). Shooting sports? How about 18fps with continuous auto focus. A feat that tops the latest full frame Nikon D5 (12fps) and Canon 1Dx Mk II (16fps). Add to that an improved sensor, auto focus and high-res mode, and you’ve got the camera many have been waiting for.
With a meager 3.3% of the vote, the Panasonic G85 floats pretty low on the list. But it’s completely understandable. It doesn’t really have any new features per se. But what it does offer is the improvements the GX85 needed. The GX85 is a great all around camera and to have 4k with Dual IS was a first for Micro Four Thirds. However, even amateur vloggers couldn’t even take the camera seriously because the lack of a mic input, articulating screen, among other things. The G85 remedies that and much more.
So why G85 over the E-M1 II?
My reasoning is quite simple:
1. The E-M1 II now has a Dual IS like technology called “Sync IS.” For me, the problem is that there are only two Olympus lenses that have IS, and there’s no word on whether this technology will work with Panasonic OIS lenses. I’ve talked about my favorite µ43 lenses in-depth, my current lineup is all Panasonic lenses (even though my main body is Olympus). Staying with Panasonic means I can take advantage of Dual IS.
Update: Love the Dual IS so far, Olympus still reigns king my a nudge (against my EM5 II anyway). However, without a Dual IS compatible lens – it’s not even close. Review upcoming.
2. I seldom ever shoot in burst mode. So while 60fps or 18fps with C-AF is a class leader, it’s something I personally don’t use.
3. I’ll probably wait for the E-M5 III as the next Olympus camera to add to the collection, I like the aesthetic a little more.
Those are the two big reasons for me, and I’ll create a comparison chart below for anyone else that needs help deciding between the G85, GH5 or E-M1 II.
What about the Panasonic GH5?
The GH5 is for videographers who also shoot stills. I’m a photographer who’s dabbling in video. Plus people are talking about May 2017… I’m not waiting that long. 🙂
Comparing the Panasonic GH5 vs G85 (G80) vs Olympus OM-D E-M1 II
The Panasonic GH5 side of the table will be rather blank as limited details have been released. I’ll fill it out as more more information comes out, until then checkout the Panasonic GH5 press release for more info.
Update: These are the general specs, there’s a lot of other things that might tip the scale for you. Checkout the full specs list on Amazon: Panasonic GH5, Panasonic G85, and the Olympus OM-D EM-1 Mk II
|Panasonic GH5||Panasonic G85 (G80)||Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mk II|
|Price||$2000 for body only||$1000 with 12-60mm kit lens
$900 for body only
|$2000 for body only|
20MP w/ 6k photo
|16MP w/ 4k Photo||20MP w/ High Res Mode|
|Stabilization||Dual IS||Dual IS||Sync IS|
|EVF||3.68M-dot OLED (.76x)||2.36M-dot OLED (.74x)||2.36M-dot LCD|
|AF||225-points with DFD||49-points with DFD||121-point cross-type phase detection AF and 121-point contrast AF|
|Burst w/ C-AF||9 fps||6fps||18fps|
|LCD||3.2inch, fully articulating||3-inch, fully articulating||3-inch, fully articulating|
|ISO||Base 200, expandable to ISO LOW 100||Base 200, expandable to ISO LOW 100||ISO LOW expandable to ISO 64|
|Max Video||4k 60fps, 1080p/180fps
2:2 10-bit 4k recording
2.2x Crop at 4k
|Flash Sync Speed||1/250||1/160||1/250s|
|Battery Life||410 shots||320 shots (optional battery grip)||Couldn’t find exact numbers, but Olympus did note a 37% improvement
and faster charging. Likely 450-500 shots.